Skip to main content

Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) has been the standard material for prototyping microfluidic devices for over two decades. Known for its optical clarity, elasticity, and ease of fabrication, PDMS has played a central role in academic and research-based microfluidics.

However, as the field advances into clinical, commercial, and industrial applications, PDMS is showing clear limitations. If you’re planning to scale up or seek long-term performance, it’s time to explore more scalable and reliable microfluidic materials.

Why PDMS May Be Limiting Your Microfluidic Application

While PDMS remains useful in early-stage research, it presents several drawbacks when transitioning to real-world use:

  • Poor chemical compatibility – Absorbs solvents and small molecules, leading to inconsistent assay results.
  • Sample evaporation – High gas permeability can dry out fluids, affecting biological experiments.
  • Weak scalability – PDMS soft lithography is not suitable for mass manufacturing or automation.
  • Unstable surface properties – Requires plasma bonding, which loses hydrophilicity over time.
  • Leaching concerns – Uncrosslinked oligomers may leach into samples, reducing biocompatibility.

These challenges make PDMS less ideal for regulated, high-throughput, or commercial microfluidic applications.

Top PDMS Alternatives for Microfluidic Devices

Thermoplastics (COC, PMMA, PC, PS)

  • Great for high-volume production using injection molding or hot embossing
  • Chemically resistant, optically clear, and mechanically stable
  • Cost-effective and compatible with automation

2. Glass

  • Excellent for high-voltage, optical, or chemical applications
  • Durable, inert, and ideal for long-term experiments
  • Reusable and compatible with permanent surface treatments

3. Paper-Based Microfluidics

  • Ultra-low-cost, biodegradable, and disposable
  • Ideal for point-of-care diagnostics and field use
  • Simple fabrication and capillary-driven flow

4. Hybrid Devices

  • Combine materials like PDMS and thermoplastics or glass
  • Leverage the best properties of each material for specific needs
  • Suitable for complex lab-on-chip systems

Why Switching from PDMS Matters?

Choosing the right material for your microfluidic system impacts more than just cost—it directly affects:

  • Device performance and repeatability
  • Compatibility with chemicals and biological samples
  • Regulatory compliance for clinical or commercial use
  • Scalability for manufacturing and distribution

If you’re moving beyond the research bench, now is the time to upgrade from PDMS to more reliable alternatives.

The Future of Microfluidics Is Beyond PDMS

PDMS has been instrumental in the development of microfluidics, but it’s no longer the only solution. Whether you’re developing a diagnostic platform, organ-on-chip system, or high-throughput screening tool, choosing the right microfluidic material is essential for success.

At Microfluidic. tech, we specialize in custom microfluidic device manufacturing using high-performance materials like thermoplastics, glass, and hybrid formats. From prototyping to production, we help you choose the material that fits your goals.

 

Hanieh Rezaee

Author Hanieh Rezaee

More posts by Hanieh Rezaee